45 min + 3: Haaland causes a bit of panic in the box and Odegaard has time to stop and steady himself before shooting. Alisson sprawls and saves. Odegaard should have done better with the time he was given.

45 min +1: A corner for Norway, wasted again. Fox says Haaland has scored every 14 touches this World Cup. Why don’t they just pass it to him 14 times then?

45 min: Six minutes of added time.

44 min: Norway are giving the ball away every few minutes. They’re very lucky not to have been punished.

43 min: Norway go back to the 90s and lump it long. Haaland nearly chases it through to create a chance. A few moments later he lays it off to Odegaard, whose shot is blocked for a corner. Nothing comes of it.

41 min: Brazil sit in possession on the edge of the Norway box. Vini is given too much room again but Ryerson recovers. A few moments later Vini twists and turns in the area and Nyland has to pull off a good save to keep the scores level.

38 min: Haaland tries to hook/lob it over Alisson but he doesn’t quite get the needed height and arc. Smart play though. He could do well, this kid. “Why don’t Norway do the old cross to the big man and see what he can do? Some intricate plays in possession but no crosses is irritating me to no end,” asks Daniel Wright on email.

36 min: Norway are turning it over like Russell Westbrook. Haaland gets a rare touch but … gives it away. Then Brazil give it away and, on the counter attack, Odegaard smacks the ball into the side netting. If both teams counter-attack is that just an attack?

34 min: Brazil continue to look scary on the break. Vini dances away from the Norwegian defence but can’t catch up with the ball before it wends its way towards a goal kick.

31 min: Martinelli races away from his marker and flashes the ball across goal. Nyland gets a boot to it and is very relieved to see it deflect away from the net. That could have gone anywhere.

29 min: We’re back. A few people have written in to say that the Norwegian defender got a touch on the penalty. Looked stone cold where I was sitting but it doesn’t matter – they missed anyway. Speaking of which, here’s Martin Gamage. “I genuinely think stutter run up penalties discomfit the taker more than the keeper. Practice your best penalty and take it with a smooth run up. If you get it right, the keeper won’t save it. Which is typically Kane’s technique until he tried that stutter run up against Croatia - off which, of course, he missed.”

28 min: Drinks break. They’ll have sweated a fair bit in this wet bulb extravaganza. Nusa has been a wonderful livewire for Norway so far. He doesn’t actually get very far but he’s scampering about with the ball at any opportunity.

26 min: The Fox broadcast says Bruno Guimaraes is the first Brazilian to miss a World Cup penalty since 1986. Yikes.

25 min: Free-kick to Norway to the left of the goal, about 45 yards out. All set up for Odegaard to swing it in but they take the slow approach instead and Brazil win the bacll back. Norway are controlling the possession but they’re turning it over a lot, and Brazil look very dangerous on the counter.

22 min: Norway have 60% of the possession so far. Maybe 61% after a backpass to the keeper. They already won the Winter Olympics, why not the World Cup?

20 min: Norway were losing possession a little too easily in the early stages of this game and are playing a little slower now. Russell Eberts emails in: “When will players learn that the stuttery run up significantly lowers your chances of scoring a penalty (not to mention how silly it looks)? My unofficial reckoning is that only Mbappe has scored with that run up, and there have been about ten misses so far this tournament with it. Get rid of it.”

18 min: Norway know they’ve gotten away with one there. Both teams are charging around, not sure how long that will last in this humidity.

15 min: No idea why Vini didn’t take that penalty. And why people still take stutter step penalties.

10 min: Brazil mount their first attack. Vini is given loads of space in the left – probably not the best player to give space – but he can’t deliver a cross from the byline before the balls runs out for a goal kick.

8 min: Back to the offside goal. The Norwegians ripped their opponents on the way to the “goal”. The Brazilians couldn’t handle their pace and direct play. Still, would have helped if Norway had stayed onside.

6 min: Norway are pinging it about like, well, Brazil. They win a corner after some good work by Sorloth. Haaland prowls in the area. Brazil hack the ball away.

3 min (and a bit): Norway have a goal ruled out for offside. Berg has the ball in the back of the net but it’s correctly called offside. Oof, what a start that would have been. It’s still fairly good anyway.

3 min: Norway attacks early and win a throw in close to the Brazil area. Then they decide to work it back into their own half. They’re … steady?

1 min: We’re off. My brother decides to call me: this guy’s timing. Both teams in their familiar kits: Brazil in yellow and Norway in red. By the way, Raphinha was warming up earlier and could play some part in the game off the bench after his hamstring troubles.

The anthems. Brazil’s familiar, jaunty anthem is belted out by the swarms of yellow shirts in the stands. It’s followed by the Norwegian anthem, there are fewer Norway fans at the MetLife but there still a decent smattering of red. Next: the football!

Looks like the White House lobbied for Balogun’s red card to be taken back. Nothing to see here:

The players are in the tunnel and everyone is looking very cheery. Vini and Haaland hug. Haaland hugs a mascot. Two of the mascots hug. Theme of the match so far: hugs.

Imagine escaping the hideous, scarred landscape of the beaches of Rio or the fjords of Norway and finally getting to play football among the highways and malls of New Jersey. Its what’s dreams are made of.

Justin Kavanagh on the Balogun red/non-red: “Whatever the merits or otherwise of the Balogun red card, presidential pardons have no place in football”.

Just a reminder that Gabriel and Haaland should enjoy meeting up again today:

Tim Exton has some thoughts on the Balogun situation.

“Like you, I believe it was a harsh red but I disagree that it needed to stand! That said, there should be an expedited appeals procedure, rather than it being left to the all-too-Fifa-ish behind closed doors reconsideration.

“The fact Trump celebrated it, when the future likes of Balogun would be denied US citizenship, is just the icing on the Corruption Gateaux (sounded more fancy than the alliterative ‘Cake’)!”

Joakim Nysnø writes in. I think maaaaaybe he’s a Norway fan:

“I cannot believe how anxiously giddy I am before our match against Brazil – almost to the point of missing the days when a Norway game was a great excuse to not watch football that evening. Lars Sivertsen’s piece really took me back to that euphoric Saint John’s Eve in 1998, being 11 year old and feeling like the whole country roared in unison as “Our Best Men” beat the best team in the world, in what many still consider to be our greatest sporting achievement. (Never mind that Brazil had already secured the top spot in the group and had little to play for.) But the article also reminded me of how alone and isolated I felt when watching that entirely forgettable round-of-16 game against Italy – our heroes “exposed” as toothless, inferior and, most of all, boring. I’m really proud of the fact that, win or lose, this group of players will not be that. And the fact that there’s a decent chance that they repeat the feat – this time against a Brazilian team with a point to prove? No matter what, the memories of this night will be happy ones! Heia Norge!

By the way, if you’re interested in reading more about Norway’s win against Brazil in 1998, I would highly recommend Lars Siversten’s piece from Friday in this very publication:

Scandinavian Solidarity Department:

“I will be rooting enthusiastically for our Norwegian neighbours while rowing in my armchair,” writes Lars Bøgegaard. “The Swedes has been to a World Cup-final and reached two semifinals, while we Danes got to the quarterfinals in 1998 losing narrowly 3-2 against … Brazil. Now it’s Norway’s turn to experience the sheer happiness, I hope.”

So … anyone want to talk about Folarin Balogun? It was an idiotic decision to give him a red card. But once he was suspended, the decision should have stuck. The Belgian FA are rightly fuming, and Gianni knows what they’re going to say if Balogun scores a 90th minute winner. The US were winning some neutrals around, but most of the world outside the States will be cheering on Belgium for now. I imagine there will be some anger among Fifa delegates who already believe richer nations get preferential treatment.

Matt Emerson emails in: “I really hope that Julian Ryerson’s nickname is Ned.” Oh, you mean Needle Nose Ned? Ned the Head? That guy?

JULIAN Ryerson will have his work cut out today. He’ll be dealing with Vini and Martinelli cutting in from the left, and will also be a threat at set-pieces along with Odergaard.

Norway, by the way, have never lost to Brazil. In the four previous matches between these two teams, there have been two Norwegian wins and two draws. The teams have met once in the World Cup, when Norway beat Brazil 2-1 in 1998 (caveat: it was the final game of the group stage and Brazil had already qualified).

Norway coach Stale Solbakken played in that 1998 game and is sort of confident they can repeat that result. Maybe. Kind of. Perhaps.

“Brazil are favourites, of course they are, but we are hopeful that we will give them a match, and we are not playing the game for fun – we are playing to win the game and to reach the quarterfinals,” said Solbakken. “It’s possible, but it’s very difficult.”

It’s Peter Oh’s music interlude:

“In the buildup to this match I’ve been listening to Gilberto Gil’s 1998 album O Sol de Oslo - The Sun of Oslo - an eclectic collaboration of Brazilian and Norwegian musicians.

“In the closing track ‘Oslodum’ - a nod to the legendary percussion group Olodum in the city of Salvador in Brazil’s northeast - Gil affectionately sings about Norway as the terra do bacalhau - the land of cod.

“Who knows how the match will play out. A new hand of God or the land of cod? A goalkeeper howler and the hand of cod? In any case, one team will win and the other will row home, I mean go home. No matter what, the sun will rise again in Oslo tomorrow.”

Weather watch

We’ll have no repeat of the crushing heat of France v Paraguay in Philadelphia yesterday. It’s muggy and overcast here in New York City today (only nine hours from New York/New Jersey Stadium by public transport!) but significantly cooler than yesterday. I’m not saying I’d want to chase around Vini and Haaland for 90 minutes in this heat (although it would mean I was a professional footballer and incredibly rich) but it’s manageable.

Leander Schaerlaeckens is at New York/New Jersey Stadium for us today and has some crowd news.

“Judging by the crowd filling into the arena here, it’s entirely possible that yellow is the only color that exists,” he writes.

Tom will be here shortly. In the meantime, here’s Graham Ruthven with a short preview of today’s game:

Brazil are far from a perfect team, but Carlo Ancelotti is finding solutions to their problems. The comeback win over Japan in the round of 32 highlighted the quality of a team that was written off by some early in the tournament. This might not be a vintage Brazil outfit, but with Ancelotti in charge they have momentum.

Norway also have momentum after seeing off Ivory Coast in the last round. Most encouraging for Stale Solbakken was that Haaland and Martin Odegaard didn’t even play all that way. Instead, the likes of Antonio Nusa and Oscar Bobb stepped up to get Norway through. They’re more than just a one (or two) man team.

Player to watch: Vinicius Junior, Brazil - There will be no shortage of star power in New Jersey for this match, but Vinicius could be the most electrifying, and influential, player for either team. If the winger turns up, Brazil could have the edge.